Legal betting in New Zealand 2026: what the monopoly actually costs the punter

Updated October 2026

Licensed

Available in US

Fast payouts

18+ Only

Current as of 27 October 2026 · verified against the Department of Internal Affairs register and the Racing Industry Act 2020

A punter in New Zealand opens a betting app, types a deposit, places a wager. The transaction is small; the statute behind it is not. Since 28 June 2025 the Racing Industry Act 2020, as amended by the Racing Industry Amendment Act 2025, says no person or organisation except TAB New Zealand may offer racing or sports betting to a person in New Zealand, regardless of where that person lives or where the operator is incorporated. The Department of Internal Affairs told offshore providers to withdraw with immediate effect. That single section of statute is what this page is about — what it does to the market a New Zealand punter actually meets, what it leaves on the table, and what it costs a bettor who decides to look the other way.

This is a market with one lawful online bookmaker and ten brands that show up regardless. The work is not to find a winner among them; the work is to read the statute straight, look at what each brand actually offers, and tell the punter where the price is paid.

The statute: section 74AAA and what it changes

The change is short. Section 74AAA of the Racing Industry Act 2020, inserted by the Racing Industry Amendment Act 2025 and in force from 28 June 2025, prohibits anyone other than TAB New Zealand from offering racing or sports betting to a person in New Zealand. The Department of Internal Affairs, which monitors compliance with section 92A of the same Act, named the two brands that remain authorised for online racing and sports betting: TAB and Betcha. TAB NZ administers the Act; it is the body the law points at, the body that runs the betting, and the body that answers to the regulator.

Two things follow from that wording. First, “offering” is what the law targets, not “placing”. The prohibition is on the operator, not the punter. Section 19(4) of the Gambling Act 2003, inserted in 2025, states that an individual may not be convicted for placing a bet with an offshore operator in breach of section 74AAA, and no published penalty for a player exists. A punter who bets with a foreign bookmaker does not commit an offence on the statute book as it stands today. The second consequence is what does follow. The Department of Internal Affairs warns that an overseas operator offering bets here may sit in a jurisdiction with weak consumer safeguards, may not address gambling harm, may not return unspent credits, and may not pay out large wins. No New Zealand complaints route reaches a Curaçao, Anjouan or Tobique licensee. The New Zealand harm-minimisation framework — deposit limits, time-outs, self-exclusion, the Problem Gambling Levy — covers TAB NZ only.

The Online Casino Gambling Act 2026 is a separate statute and a separate question. It licenses online casino gambling in New Zealand and may give TAB NZ the right to apply for a casino licence. It does not extend the betting monopoly, and a casino licence says nothing about whether its holder may take a sports or racing bet. Greyhound racing is its own matter: the Racing Industry (Closure of Greyhound Racing Industry) Amendment Bill, passed on 2 April 2026, closes commercial greyhound racing from 1 August 2026, and from that date no operator — TAB NZ or offshore — may take bets on greyhound races in New Zealand.

The two lawful brands: TAB and Betcha

TAB and Betcha are not rivals. They are the two online brands of TAB New Zealand, the only provider lawfully offering racing and sports betting to people in New Zealand since 28 June 2025. The page writes that once. Repeating it under each brand is the cheapest padding on the market.

TAB NZ runs the operation under a 25-year agreement signed with Entain in 2023. The commercial terms matter to a punter because they shape what gets spent on the product and what gets kept. Entain runs the TAB business and shares gross profits 50/50 with TAB NZ, with a minimum of $150 million a year going to TAB NZ for the first five years; Entain also pledged a one-off $100 million payment to the racing sector. The point is not that Entain is good or bad. The point is that the betting operator is the same entity the statute names, the racing industry takes a known share of what is wagered, and the product is what that arrangement produces.

The age for a TAB NZ account is 18. Account opening requires a verified New Zealand address and verified identification; the same rule applies across TAB and Betcha. The TAB NZ apps list safer-gambling tools: deposit limits, time-outs and self-exclusion, and an exclusion set on one brand applies across both. The free Gambling Helpline (0800 654 655, text 8006) and Safer Gambling Aotearoa are listed inside the apps. TAB NZ pays a Problem Gambling Levy of 0.74 per cent of gross betting revenue, in force from 1 July 2025 to 30 June 2028. The levy funds harm-minimisation services and is the visible cost a New Zealand-licensed monopoly carries and an offshore brand does not.

TAB NZ’s betting menu covers fixed-odds and tote (pool) bets. The published betting rules define Win, Place, Each Way, Quinella, Exacta, Trifecta, First Four, Double, Treble, Daily Double, Running Double, Quaddie and Big6, plus Multis and Same Game Multis (a multi whose legs come from one event). Live betting is listed in the apps; whether any statutory restriction on in-play markets applies is not established. There is no statutory per-bet cap. Limits are TAB NZ’s own terms. Spread betting and betting exchanges are outside the definition of sports betting under the Act, and no lawful New Zealand betting exchange exists; the page does not look for one.

Recreational gambling winnings in New Zealand are generally not taxable, and prize money from TAB horse, dog and trotting races is not taxable; a person who bets as a business is a different case, and the Inland Revenue guidance is general information, not tax advice. The page will not say more on the subject than that.

The eight offshore brands: what the page is comparing them against

The remaining eight brands on the spec sheet — FunBet, Rabona, RTbet, Sportaza, Rooster.bet, RoyalistPlay, Winz.io, Spinbara — do not hold a New Zealand licence. None of them names a licence that gives a right to take bets from a person in New Zealand. Some name Curaçao, Anjouan or Tobique licences, which authorise the operator in those jurisdictions and do nothing for a New Zealand punter. None is reached by a New Zealand complaints route, none is covered by the Problem Gambling Levy, and none is required to offer the harm-minimisation tools the statute applies to TAB NZ. The Advertising Standards Authority’s Gambling Advertising Code applies to betting advertisements in New Zealand, and the statute is read by DIA as covering the promotion of betting by anyone other than TAB NZ; how DIA treats betting affiliates is not established.

The page includes them for one reason: a New Zealand punter meets them. Search results return them, sports sections link to them, social channels advertise them. The comparison below is the honest description of what each one offers on its own terms, in its own country, and is set next to TAB NZ so the punter can see what the difference looks like in a sportsbook, a payment menu and a withdrawal policy. None of them is “the safe choice” for a New Zealand punter, and the page never says it is. The verdict at the end of each block is the page’s own.

What each offshore brand actually offers

FunBet

FunBet’s sportsbook covers football, ice hockey, American football, basketball, volleyball, tennis, rugby and baseball, with live betting and a bookmaker described as open around the clock. The brand names no licence that applies in New Zealand. The comparison with TAB NZ is one of menu breadth against statutory standing: FunBet runs more football and American football markets than a typical TAB NZ racing-led product, but offers that menu from a jurisdiction the Department of Internal Affairs warns may not pay out large wins and may not return unspent credits. A New Zealand punter loses any complaints route that runs through a New Zealand regulator, and lacks the harm-minimisation framework TAB NZ carries. A punter who likes the menu and accepts that the operator may decide what to do with a large withdrawal is the only reader this brand suits; that reader is advised to read the terms on maximum payouts before a single multi is placed.

Rabona

Rabona launched on 23 December 2019 as the sixth online sportsbook of the Soft2Bet group and operates under a Curaçao licence. Curaçao authorisation gives the right to take bets under Curaçao rules; it does not give the right to take bets from a person in New Zealand. The market coverage is a Soft2Bet-standard football-led bookmaker with the usual menu of live betting and virtuals. The page rates it on what it offers, not on what it is allowed to offer. The cost of choosing Rabona from New Zealand is the same one FunBet carries: no statutory standing here, no New Zealand complaints route, and the operator’s own terms govern any dispute. A bettor comparing it to TAB NZ is choosing a Curaçao-licensed menu against a New Zealand monopoly with a known levy and a known regulator; the price is paid when something goes wrong, not when the bet is placed.

RTbet

RTbet’s sportsbook covers football, tennis, table tennis, basketball, ice hockey, American football and baseball, with live betting and virtual sports. Like the rest, it is not licensed in New Zealand; only TAB NZ may offer racing and sports betting to people here. The sportsbook is mid-sized for the Curaçao-licensed tier — table tennis is a meaningful inclusion for the in-play bettor, and virtual sports extend the menu beyond real fixtures. The cost to a New Zealand punter is again the regulatory one. RTbet carries no obligation under the Racing Industry Act 2020, no New Zealand Problem Gambling Levy contribution, and no duty to honour a deposit limit, time-out or self-exclusion set under New Zealand rules. The verdict is the same shape as the rest of the offshore block: the menu is the menu; the statute is the statute.

Sportaza

Sportaza’s footer states it is licensed and regulated by the Government of the Autonomous Island of Anjouan, Union of Comoros, under licence No. ALSI-202606064-FI2. Its terms cite a separate licence, No. 0000067 issued by Tobique. Either way, neither jurisdiction authorises betting from New Zealand, and only TAB NZ may lawfully do that. The brand runs a familiar sportsbook menu with live betting; the difference between Anjouan and Tobique on a compliance page is a curiosity to a regulator and a footnote to a punter, because what matters in New Zealand is that neither licence is a New Zealand one. New Zealand statutory protection on withdrawals, complaints and harm-minimisation is absent, and the punter bears that risk if any of those situations arises. The page does not call Sportaza a safe choice for New Zealand and never will.

Rooster

Rooster is operated by Novatrix SRL, a company incorporated in Costa Rica with registration number 3-102-893958, under e-gaming licence No. 0000002 issued by the Tobique Gaming Commission. Tobique’s licence authorises the operator under Tobique rules; it does not authorise betting from New Zealand. The brand’s menu is the typical Curaçao-/Tobique-tier sportsbook with live betting and the usual payment options. The punter lacks a New Zealand complaints route and obligations under the Racing Industry Act 2020, and the operator’s terms govern the bet. A punter who weighs Rooster against TAB NZ is weighing a Tobique-licensed sportsbook against the New Zealand monopoly; the page’s view is that the monopoly wins the regulatory comparison and the offshore brand wins the menu comparison, and a reader who places the regulatory argument above the menu argument is the reader who belongs on TAB NZ.

RoyalistPlay

RoyalistPlay is owned and operated by Novatrix SRL, the same Costa Rica-registered company as Rooster.bet, with the same Tobique e-gaming licence No. 0000002. The two are sister brands running different skins over similar sportsbook engines; what applies to Rooster.bet on licensing and complaints applies to RoyalistPlay in the same words, because the operator is the same operator. A New Zealand punter who opens an account at either brand has the same regulatory exposure. The page treats them as two entries because the spec sheet does, and describes them separately on the menu because the menus differ, but the verdict on the regulatory cost is shared: only TAB NZ may offer racing and sports betting to people in New Zealand, and a Novatrix SRL brand is not TAB NZ.

Winz

Winz states it holds a licence delivered by Anjouan and Tobique; the regulatory standing in New Zealand is unchanged by which name the footer carries. Neither licence authorises betting from New Zealand, and the page does not pretend otherwise. The brand runs a sportsbook with a crypto-friendly cashier on the same Tobique-tier terms as the rest of the Novatrix SRL group. The punter faces the regulatory absence of New Zealand statutory protection and no obligation to honour a New Zealand deposit limit or self-exclusion, and the operator’s terms govern any dispute. The verdict is the verdict: TAB NZ is the lawful option in New Zealand, and a Tobique/Anjouan-licensed crypto sportsbook is not.

Spinbara

Spinbara advertises a first-deposit bonus of 100 per cent up to EUR 100 and a sport crypto welcome bonus of 100 per cent up to 200 USDT on its English site, alongside a casino welcome bonus of 100 per cent up to EUR 500 plus 200 free spins. The bonuses sit on a brand that names no licence giving it the right to accept New Zealand bets. The page describes offers qualitatively, never as codes, and never invites a sign-up at an offshore brand. New Zealand players are exposed to the same issues as the rest of the offshore block, and a 100 per cent headline bonus does not change it. The “free” in a free bet is the marketing word the page punctures with arithmetic, and that arithmetic appears later in the cost section.

What the brands cost: a worked comparison

The angle of this page is what each option costs the punter. Cost is not the same as price. Price is what the bookmaker quotes on a given market; cost is what the punter pays across a session, after the margin does its work, after the harm-minimisation framework either does or does not apply, and after a withdrawal either clears or stalls. The table below sets the brands side by side on the matters a New Zealand punter actually weighs, in the language a New Zealand punter actually uses.

Two things the table cannot say and the prose beside it must. The first is that “Not licensed in New Zealand” is the regulatory cost written out as a single word: every cell in that column carries the full absence of New Zealand statutory protection. The third column says what each operator offers on its own terms, in its own jurisdiction, with its own house rules. None of it is a New Zealand offer and none of it is enforced by the Department of Internal Affairs. A reader comparing the second column across the ten rows sees the regulatory spread immediately: two cells describe the lawful monopoly, eight describe brands the regulator has warned about. A reader comparing the third column sees the menu spread: a deeply-specified racing and sports tote in two cells, a familiar sportsbook menu in eight. Both spreads are honest; the cost of either choice lives in what the other column says.

The TAB and Betcha rows are not competitors. They are the two online skins of the same operator, run by Entain under the same 25-year agreement, with shared accounts and a shared exclusion framework. The page says that once. Putting them in the same table is a courtesy to the reader who met both names and wonders which one to open; the answer is that opening either one is opening TAB New Zealand.

What the price actually is: the expected cost of a session

A market’s payout share is what the punter gets back of every dollar wagered, taken across all outcomes of one market; the margin is what the bookmaker keeps. For a two-outcome market at decimal odds of 1.90 against 1.90, the payout share is one divided by the sum of the reciprocals: 1 ÷ (1/1.90 + 1/1.90), which is 1 ÷ (0.5263… + 0.5263…), or 1 ÷ 1.0526…, or roughly 0.95. The margin, expressed the same way, is the rest: about 0.05, or about 5 per cent.

A punter who stakes NZ$500 once on a market priced at that margin loses about NZ$25 on average over many repetitions of the same bet. The expected cost is the turnover times the margin, not a guarantee of any single session — a single bet at 1.90 against 1.90 either returns NZ$950 or nothing, and the average is only visible across many bets. The number to remember is the band: an expected loss of roughly 5 per cent of turnover on a market priced near evens, more on a market the bookmaker has priced more conservatively, less on a market the bookmaker has priced more aggressively. The exact figure is the punter’s own; the band is what the math gives.

That expected cost is the price of the bet, not the price of the licence. A New Zealand punter who bets only with TAB NZ pays the Problem Gambling Levy indirectly, because 0.74 per cent of TAB NZ’s gross betting revenue funds harm-minimisation services the punter can use. The levy is not a tax on a winning bet; it is a contribution to the framework that sits behind the deposit limit, the time-out and the self-exclusion. A punter who bets with an offshore brand pays no levy, gets no harm-minimisation framework, and gets no New Zealand complaints route. The “free” in a free offshore sportsbook is the marketing word the page punctures with that arithmetic: the bet costs its margin either way, and the offshore book costs the regulatory framework on top.

Where a New Zealand punter actually goes for help

The page writes this once. The Gambling Helpline (0800 654 655, text 8006) and Safer Gambling Aotearoa are the New Zealand harm-minimisation services a punter can reach directly; they are free, confidential and outside the betting operator. The TAB NZ apps surface them inside the product; the offshore brands do not, and the offshore brands carry no obligation to. A punter who has set a deposit limit, a time-out or a self-exclusion on TAB NZ has set it across TAB and Betcha together, because the two are one operator. A punter who has set a limit on an offshore brand has set it on that brand only, on whatever terms that brand’s own tools offer, with whatever dispute route that brand’s own jurisdiction provides. The page does not say one is safer than the other. The page says the regulatory framework reaches TAB NZ and does not reach an Anjouan or Tobique licensee, and the punter is the one who decides what that difference is worth.

The Racing Industry Act 2020’s section 89 makes betting under 18 an offence; the age for a TAB NZ account is 18. Land-based casinos in New Zealand are 20 — that is a separate rule for a separate product and the page does not merge the two. Anyone under 18 reading this page is the wrong reader for it.

The advertising rules a punter sees

The Advertising Standards Authority’s Gambling Advertising Code applies to betting advertisements in New Zealand. Ads must not target children (under 14) or young people (14 to under 18), judged by context, appeal and expected audience; a significant-audience threshold of 25 per cent applies where accurate data exists. Ads must not encourage harm and must be truthful, with terms available. TAB NZ runs “bonus bets” promotions; the size and the wagering terms are TAB NZ’s own, and the page never prints one as a code. No New Zealand rule on bonus-bet size or turnover was found; what governs the offer is TAB NZ’s terms, and what governs the marketing is the ASA Code. The point is that the regulatory frame on advertising is real, and it points at the lawful monopoly. The offshore block is not addressed by the Code in the same way, because the Code addresses advertisements aimed at New Zealand audiences, and the offshore brands the punter meets are not always aiming.

What the page does not do

The page does not call any offshore brand legal, licensed, approved or safe in New Zealand. The page does not call offshore betting illegal for the player, because no statute says it is. The page does not urge the reader to bet, to sign up, to claim a bonus or to use a code. The page describes what the statute says, what the regulator warns, what each brand offers on its own terms, and what the math gives. The rest is the punter’s call.

The headline, restated

The Racing Industry Act 2020 amendment from 28 June 2025 makes TAB NZ the only lawful online bookmaker in New Zealand, with Betcha as the second online brand of the same operator. The Department of Internal Affairs administers the Act, told offshore providers to withdraw with immediate effect, and warns that overseas operators may sit in jurisdictions with weak consumer safeguards. The eight offshore brands on the spec sheet each offer a sportsbook under Curaçao, Anjouan or Tobique licences, none of which authorise New Zealand betting. The risk of choosing an offshore brand is the absence of New Zealand statutory protection on withdrawals, complaints and harm-minimisation; the alternative is the TAB NZ monopoly with its menu spread. The price on a single market is what the bookmaker’s margin takes, which is roughly 5 per cent of turnover on a market priced near evens. That is the math; the statute is the frame; the call is the punter’s.

Frequently asked questions

Are offshore betting sites legal?

Offshore betting sites are not licensed to take bets from people in New Zealand. Since 28 June 2025, the Racing Industry Act 2020 (section 74AAA) makes it unlawful for any person or organisation other than TAB New Zealand to offer racing or sports betting to a person in New Zealand. The Department of Internal Affairs told offshore providers to withdraw with immediate effect.

Is any online sports betting legal in New Zealand?

Yes — the online sports betting offered by TAB NZ and its sister brand Betcha. Section 74AAA of the Racing Industry Act 2020, in force from 28 June 2025, names TAB NZ as the only operator allowed to offer online racing and sports betting to New Zealand customers. No other brand holds that authorisation, and there is no licence register for betting in New Zealand because there is only one lawful provider.

Which bookmaker may lawfully take sports and racing bets in New Zealand?

TAB New Zealand is the only bookmaker that may lawfully take racing and sports bets in New Zealand. TAB and Betcha are the two online brands through which TAB NZ operates, run by Entain under a 25-year agreement. Both brands are governed by the same harm-minimisation framework, the same Problem Gambling Levy contribution and the same Department of Internal Affairs oversight.

Are TAB and Betcha two different bookmakers?

TAB and Betcha are two online brands of the same operator, TAB New Zealand. They share a parent operator, a shared customer framework and a shared exclusion rule — a self-exclusion set on one applies to the other. They are not rivals and they do not compete with each other; choosing between them is choosing between two entry points to the same product.

Is a player punished for betting with an overseas bookmaker?

No. Section 19(4) of the Gambling Act 2003, inserted in 2025, says an individual may not be convicted for placing a bet with an offshore betting operator in breach of section 74AAA of the Racing Industry Act 2020. No published penalty for a player was found. The statute targets the operator, not the punter; the Department of Internal Affairs still warns of the risks of betting with an overseas operator that may not return unspent credits or pay out large wins.

How is betting on horse racing legal in New Zealand?

Betting on horse racing in New Zealand is legal when done with TAB NZ or Betcha, the two online brands of the only lawful provider. The published TAB NZ betting rules cover Win, Place, Each Way, Quinella, Exacta, Trifecta, First Four, Double, Treble, Daily Double, Running Double, Quaddie and Big6, plus Multis and Same Game Multis. Greyhound racing closes commercially in New Zealand from 1 August 2026 under the Racing Industry (Closure of Greyhound Racing Industry) Amendment Bill, passed on 2 April 2026.

Prepared by the Nzsoccerodds editorial staff.